From Chris.Judd@dep.state.fl.us Mon Jun 7 19:51:48 2004 From: Chris.Judd@dep.state.fl.us (Judd, Chris) Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 14:51:48 -0400 Subject: gis-l: FW: Network Repairs, Douglas/Annex Warehouse Bldg. - TONIGHT Message-ID: GIS Users, BIS Systems and Networking group is making emergency repairs to the = network at the Douglas/Annex Data center. The following services will be down, = Leica Image Analysis license manager, all file based raster services including ArcIMS, Webpoint and Imagetools for ArcView 3.2 /ArcGIS 8.x. GIS Section > -----Original Message----- > From: Wheeler, Joanie =20 > Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:39 PM > To: techreps; Smith, Debby S. > Subject: Network Repairs, Douglas/Annex Warehouse Bldg. - TONIGHT=20 >=20 > Network Repairs Douglas/Annex Warehouse Bldg. - Tonight, June 7 >=20 > The network in the Douglas/Annex Warehouse building will be taken > down tonight from 7:00 p.m. until 7:30 p.m. to replace defective = hardware. > This outage will effect the following services temporarily: >=20 > * DEP Microsoft Outlook E-Mail will be down during this time. This = also > includes Outlook on Blackberry Units as well as OWA (Outlook Web = Access).=20 > * Common drives which reside on TLH_PTT1, TLH_BDG1, EPIC80 including > Oracle Tools on TLHRES1=20 > * Network Connections in Annex A & B=20 >=20 > Please notify your user community. >=20 From Kimberly.D.Jackson@dep.state.fl.us Tue Jun 8 14:19:48 2004 From: Kimberly.D.Jackson@dep.state.fl.us (Jackson, Kimberly D.) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:19:48 -0400 Subject: gis-l: Looking for a county coverage Message-ID: <40797728C8B10C45AC7A5433787F91553B4431@tlhexsmb4.floridadep.net> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C44D5B.45C8A320 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Several of us are in need of a Florida county boundaries coverage, that contains ONLY the internal boundary lines, not the coastline. I have = seen it used before but don't currently have a copy. Does anyone have a = coverage like this they could share - before we start editing a new one? = Thanks! Kim Jackson Environmental Consultant, GIS phone: x-5553 suncom: 205-8553 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C44D5B.45C8A320 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looking for a county coverage

Hi,
Several of us are in need of a Florida = county boundaries coverage, that contains ONLY the internal boundary = lines, not the coastline.  I have seen it used before but don't = currently have a copy.  Does anyone have a coverage like this they = could share -  before we start editing a new one?  = Thanks!

Kim Jackson
Environmental Consultant, = GIS
phone:    = x-5553
suncom: 205-8553


------_=_NextPart_001_01C44D5B.45C8A320-- From Michele.Mayo@dep.state.fl.us Tue Jun 8 14:51:17 2004 From: Michele.Mayo@dep.state.fl.us (Mayo, Michele) Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 09:51:17 -0400 Subject: gis-l: Looking for a county coverage Message-ID: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C44D5F.ABCF9026 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kim, =20 There's a BASE.TIGER_COUNTIES and a BASE.TIGER_COUNTIES_2000 on SDE. = Both have very generalized shorelines buffered about +/- five miles beyond = the true shoreline. =20 Michele =20 =20 =20 -----Original Message----- From: Jackson, Kimberly D.=20 Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:20 AM To: gis-l@lists.dep.state.fl.us Subject: gis-l: Looking for a county coverage =20 Hi,=20 Several of us are in need of a Florida county boundaries coverage, that contains ONLY the internal boundary lines, not the coastline. I have = seen it used before but don't currently have a copy. Does anyone have a = coverage like this they could share - before we start editing a new one? = Thanks! Kim Jackson=20 Environmental Consultant, GIS=20 phone: x-5553=20 suncom: 205-8553=20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C44D5F.ABCF9026 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Looking for a county coverage

Kim,

 

There’s a = BASE.TIGER_COUNTIES and a BASE.TIGER_COUNTIES_2000 on SDE.  Both have very generalized = shorelines buffered about +/- five miles beyond the true shoreline.

 

Michele

 

 

 

-----Original = Message-----
From: Jackson, Kimberly = D.
Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 9:20 = AM
To: = gis-l@lists.dep.state.fl.us
Subject: gis-l: Looking = for a county coverage

 

Hi,
Several of us are in need of a Florida county = boundaries coverage, that contains ONLY the internal boundary lines, not the coastline.  I have seen it used before but don't currently have a copy.  Does anyone have a coverage like this they could share = -  before we start editing a new one?  Thanks!

Kim = Jackson
Environmental Consultant, GIS
phone:    x-5553
suncom: 205-8553

 

------_=_NextPart_001_01C44D5F.ABCF9026-- From Chris.Judd@dep.state.fl.us Thu Jun 24 16:57:03 2004 From: Chris.Judd@dep.state.fl.us (Judd, Chris) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 11:57:03 -0400 Subject: gis-l: GIS Services down tonight (6/24) for hardware upgrade Message-ID: GIS Users, ArcSDE services will be down tonight for a hardware upgrade at 6:00 EDT = and will resume normal operation start of business day Friday (6/25). This = will impact ArcIMS, ArcSDE and license manager resources. BIS/GIS From Chris.Judd@dep.state.fl.us Fri Jun 25 14:07:07 2004 From: Chris.Judd@dep.state.fl.us (Judd, Chris) Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 09:07:07 -0400 Subject: gis-l: Regulatory Layers refresh problems Message-ID: GIS Users, Yesterday's hardware upgrade on ArcSDE created a failure in the License manager restart process. As a result, ArcSDE was not able to recreate = the regulatory refresh layers (comet, STORET, gwis...). The layers are = fully functional but do not reflect changes made in the regulatory databases = on Thursday. This does _not_ impact the remainder of data in ArcSDE which = is largely static. We expect the refresh layer process to return to its = normal operational status by tomorrow. BIS/GIS From Linc.Clay@dep.state.fl.us Wed Jun 30 16:50:57 2004 From: Linc.Clay@dep.state.fl.us (Clay, Linc) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:50:57 -0400 Subject: gis-l: ArcGIS 9.0 - ArcSDE 9.0 - ArcIMS 9.0 Message-ID: GIS Users, As you may have seen in the ESRI publications, ArcGIS 9.0 is now = shipping. We received ArcGIS, ArcSDE and ArcIMS 9.0 a couple of weeks ago. We = have opened the boxes and started contemplating the new software. Here is = our current game plan. ArcGIS 9.0 (Desktop and Workstation) - ArcGIS 9.0 will require a new and different license manager. Running ArcGIS 8.x parallel with 9.x is technically possible, but has some legal (licensing) ramifications. We = are currently working on how best to run parallel license managers and on = how long we can legally do so. We are also working on burning software CDs = for the Districts and on the network install for those with good = connectivity. I expect that we will be releasing Desktop and Workstation ArcGIS 9.0 by = mid August. Based on what I know now, upgrading from 8.3 to 9.0 will be = optional based on your needs. We plan to be supporting ArcGIS 8.3 at least = through the end of the calendar year. Once we have worked out the legal issues = and license manager technical issues, we'll have a more definite date. (If = you don't need ArcGIS 9.0, I wouldn't upgrade for a while.) ArcSDE 9.0 - Since we just migrated to ArcSDE 8.3, we're in no big hurry = to migrate again. (The migration process is rather costly due to the = extensive pre-migration testing required. It took about 450 effort hours for the = 8.3 migration.) For 9.0, we plan to use a different architecture: running = ArcSDE as a Real Application Cluster (RAC) on several cheap (but powerful) rack-mounted Dells talking to Oracle on EPIC31 (the current ArcSDE 8.3 = and Oracle platform). This architecture change should reduce the costs of serving data from ArcSDE, provide failover protection, and possibly = increase performance. We will have to do a good bit of configuration testing for = the RAC setup, so I would not expect a change to ArcSDE until late winter of = 2005 at the earliest. ArcIMS 9.0 - Again, since we just migrated to ArcIMS 4.0.1, we're in no = big hurry. We have begun testing ArcIMS 9.0 to determine the differences = from 4.0.1. Once we have determined those differences, we'll work with the = FDEP ArcIMS developer community to create a migration plan. One migration difference we expect, however, is to sharply reduce the period of time = that we run both versions parallel. For the last migration it was almost 5 months, which was much more than the developer community used. = Accordingly, we will reduce the parallel period to the minimum comfortable duration needed: a couple of weeks probably. That's where we are currently headed on the 9.0 front. We'll keep you = posted as plans and dates get more definite. Thanks, -Linc Linc Clay FDEP/DRAM/BIS/GIS 2600 Blair Stone Rd, MS 6520 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2400 Voice: 850-245-8295, SC 205-8295 Fax: 850-245-8263, SC 205-8263 Email: linc.clay@dep.state.fl.us