[Pharmwaste] Rachel's #824: Ending Government Regulation, Pt. 1

Tenace, Laurie Laurie.Tenace@dep.state.fl.us
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:46:07 -0400


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5C84A.B761314A
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

=20

For those who like to keep up on the issue of endocrine disruptors, you =
may
be interested in subscribing to Rachel's Precaution Reporter, a new free
publication. Rachel's is very political, but I think it is important to =
learn
what people are reading - whether you believe it is true or not! =
Rachel's
provides thought-provoking opinions, promotes the precautionary approach =
and
often focuses on endocrine disruptors -

=20

Happy Reading!

Laurie

=20

=20

=20

=20

To start your own free subscription to Rachel's,=20
send a blank Email to: join-rachel@gselist.org

ANNOUNCEMENT: We have just launched a new
publication called Rachel's Precaution Reporter,
aimed at keeping readers informed about the
precautionary principle as it spreads around
the world and across the U.S. You can find it here
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/rpr-html.htm> .
To start your own free subscription, send a=20
blank E-mail to join-rpr-html@gselist.org.
=20
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH NEWS #824
http://www.rachel.org
August 18, 2005
=20
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
=20
Part 1:
ENDING GOVERNMENT REGULATION BY MANUFACTURING DOUBT
=20
By Peter Montague
=20
Thirty years ago, scientists began reporting birth defects and unusual
homosexual behavior in wildlife, which they couldn't explain. (See
Rachel's #146 <http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=3D992> =
, #263
<http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=3D870> .) By the late =
1980s,
Theo Colborn -- an expert
on the Great Lakes -- thought she saw a pattern, and she pulled
together a scientific meeting in July 1991 to discuss it. The result
was the "Wingspread Statement" on hormone-disrupting chemicals which
began:
=20
"We are certain of the following:
=20
"A large number of man-made chemicals that have been released into the
environment, as well as a few natural ones, have the potential to
disrupt the endocrine [hormone] system of animals, including
humans.... Many wildlife populations are already affected by these
compounds." (Rachel's #263
<http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=3D870> )
=20
Five years later, Colborn, joined by biologist Pete Myers and
journalist Dianne Dumanoski, popularized the idea that industrial
chemicals at low levels can interfere with hormones in wildlife and
quite possibly in humans. Their book, "Our Stolen Future," caused New
York Times science writer Gina Kolata to go ballistic. Reviewing the
book, Kolata scoffed at the main hypothesis, that industrial chemicals
may be interfering with the hormones that control and regulate growth,
health and behavior in wildlife and humans, leading to increases in
birth defects, problems of sexual development, breast cancer, prostate
cancer, and even mental problems like attention deficit disorder,
reduced IQ, and violent behavior.
=20
Kolata said "the factual basis of the book's alarms... have been
refuted by careful studies," though she did not cite a single study as
evidence. To be fair, Ms. Kolata was merely reflecting the views of
the chemical industry on the question of hormone disruption. The
industry had a great deal at stake. If the theory of hormone
disruption were true, the chemical industry could only be viewed as a
major menace to public health and the natural environment.
=20
Now, almost 10 years later, the debate over hormone disruption seems
to be over. The Wall Street Journal conceded this summer that low
levels of industrial chemicals are linked to rising rates of childhood
cancer and brain disorders, among other maladies.
=20
Here's the opening paragraph of the Journal's front-page story July
25, 2005:
=20
"For years, scientists have struggled to explain rising rates of some
cancers and childhood brain disorders. Something about modern living
has driven a steady rise of certain maladies, from breast and prostate
cancer to autism and learning disabilities.
=20
"One suspect now is drawing intense scrutiny: the prevalence in the
environment of certain industrial chemicals at extremely low levels. A
growing body of animal research suggests to some scientists that even
minute traces of some chemicals, always assumed to be biologically
insignificant, can affect such processes as gene activation and the
brain development of newborns.
=20
"An especially striking finding: It appears that some substances may
have effects at the very lowest exposures that are absent at higher
levels.... This challenges an axiom of toxicology stated by the Swiss
chemist Paracelsus nearly 500 years ago: The dose makes the
poison."[1
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/chemical_raise_health_issues.wsj.050725=
.htm
> ] [See Rachel's #754
<http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=3D2261> , #755
<http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=3D2271> .]
=20
The Journal went on to point out that many scientists are now
convinced that insignificant levels of several individual chemicals
can combine to produce significant effects.
=20
The Journal explained: The harm from low-level exposure to a single
hormone-disrupting chemical "will always be small," said Andreas
Kortenkamp, who directs scientific research on hormone-disrupting
chemicals for the European Union (EU). But exposure to low levels of
many chemicals simultaneously will produce a cumulative effect on the
human hormone system "that is likely to be very large," Kortenkamp
told the Journal.
=20
Given these facts, it seems safe to say that the chemical industry is
now widely acknowledged as a major menace to public health and the
natural environment. This presents the industry with an uncomfortable
problem of financial liability.
=20
Naturally, as a matter of self-preservation, the industry has
developed a defensive response. Of course the industry has been
studying these problems at least as long as Theo Colborn has been
studying them. Industry scientists and lawyers knew the truth long
before it made its way onto the front page of the Wall Street Journal
-- just as the tobacco industry knew the truth about tobacco at least
50 years before they publicly acknowledged the problem of lung cancer.
=20
The chemical industry response has been complex and exceedingly
clever, intended to make it impossible for government to effectively
regulate any industry. The strategy has succeeded in spades.
=20
In the "old days" -- say, around 1975 -- a chemical like DDT could be
banned because government scientists examined the scientific
literature, balanced "the weight of the evidence," and concluded that
DDT was probably causing serious harm to wildlife, such as the bald
eagle, our national emblem.
=20
Today it would be impossible to ban a chemical on such grounds because
a series of laws and regulations passed during the past 20 years have
changed the standards for scientific "proof" that government
regulators must meet.
=20
Industry's main strategy for ending government regulation is the
manufacture of uncertainty and doubt. "If, for example, studies show
that a company is exposing its workers to dangerous levels of a
certain chemical, the business typically responds by hiring its own
researchers to cast doubt on the studies," writes David Michaels in
Scientific American.[2
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/doubt_is_their_product.050601.htm> ]
=20
Increasingly, the U.S. regulatory system can be paralyzed by doubt.
The system assumes that anyone can do anything they want to do (so
long as it is legal), until harm can be proven. Until harm can be
proven, anything goes. If I move into your town and set up a small
shop and start belching bright blue smoke into the sky, it is up to
you to prove that blue smoke causes harm before anyone can question my
operation.
=20
Once suspicion of harm is raised, the burden is still on the
government and the public to prove harm. If one study shows that blue
smoke causes asthma in children, the government may begin to examine
all studies of blue smoke and eventually act on the weight of the
evidence. (If government ever takes action to control blue smoke, we
blue smoke producers can demand our day in court, but that's a later
chapter in this story.)
=20
Given the way the system works, as a blue smoke producer, it pays me
to discredit previous blue smoke studies, to change "the weight of the
evidence." With blue smoke studies in doubt, regulators will be
paralyzed. "On the one hand we have studies showing harm from blue
smoke, on the other hand those studies have been questioned by the
Blue Smoke Association. Until this scientific dispute is resolved, we
can't take action." This is how the regulatory system works.
=20
"Doubt is our product."
=20
It was the tobacco industry that discovered the power of doubt in a
regulatory system that can be paralyzed by uncertainty. In 1969, an
executive of Brown & Williamson (now owned by R.J. Reynolds) actually
described the strategy in a memo: "Doubt is our product since it is
the best means for competing with the 'body of fact' that exists in
the mind of the general public."[2
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/doubt_is_their_product.050601.htm> ]
=20
It turns out that creating doubt is remarkably easy to do. Take the
example of atrazine, the potent weed killer that has been used for
nearly 50 years. An estimated 80 million pounds of atrazine are spread
into the environment each year in the U.S. In some environments, it
persists and retains its toxicity for decades.
=20
The initial concern about atrazine was cancer.  Atrazine clearly
causes cancer in laboratory rats. And the workers in a Louisiana
atrazine factory have unusually high rates of prostate cancer. But
Syngenta -- the Swiss firm that makes hundreds of millions of dollars
each year selling atrazine in the U.S. -- has successfully cast doubt
on these facts, paralyzing regulators. Syngenta argues that atrazine
affects rats via biological mechanisms that do not exist in humans,
and they say their workers have high rates of prostate cancer only
because the company is extra vigilant looking for cancers among its
workers.
=20
Meanwhile, for years evidence has been accumulating, showing that
atrazine scrambles the sex hormones of frogs, turning males into
hermaphrodites. A hermaphrodite has sex organs of both genders. To
prove otherwise, Syngenta hired a biologist named Tyrone B. Hayes, a
biology professor at University of California, Berkeley. But Professor
Hayes's experiments came out wrong and showed unmistakably that
atrazine "demasculinizes" male frogs. Compared to unexposed frogs,
males frogs exposed to atrazine have smaller larynxes (voice boxes),
male hormone (testosterone) levels that are one-tenth of normal, and a
mix of male and female traits -- they are hermaphrodites. Syngenta
would not give Professor Hayes permission to publish his studies, so
he ran a series of his own experiments on a wider variety of frogs,
and published his results in prestigious journals (Nature, and the
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). "We showed that
these animals are chemically castrated," Professor Hayes said. Four
other groups of independent researchers in three countries reached
similar conclusions.[3
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/data_quality_act_is_nemesis_of_regulati=
on.2
0040816.htm> ]
=20
Syngenta solved this problem by creating doubt about Professor Hayes's
studies. They hired scientists to reproduce the studies, but those
scientists did sloppy work and were not able to reach the same
conclusions that Hayes reached. An EPA panel of outside experts found
numerous flaws and mistakes in the Syngenta studies. In at least two
of the studies, the "unexposed" group of frogs had actually been
exposed to atrazine. Not surprisingly, those studies did not find a
significant difference between the "exposed" and "unexposed" frogs. In
another of the studies, no conclusion could be reached because 80-90%
of the frogs died, apparently as a result of inadequate care. As
Professor Hayes summarized the situation, what Syngenta scientists did
"was produce a number of studies that were purposefully flawed and
misleading, and that changed the weight of the evidence."[3
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/data_quality_act_is_nemesis_of_regulati=
on.2
0040816.htm> ]
=20
So it is rather easy to cast doubt on a scientific study -- simply try
to reproduce the study using methods that are sloppy enough to assure
that the results will not be reproduced. "On the one hand we have a
study showing harm, on the other hand some scientists have been unable
to reproduce these results." So regulators are paralyzed.
=20
As David Michaels told a Texas reporter, "corporations and others who
manufacture dangerous products and pollutants have realized that by
adding manufactured uncertainty to the equation, they can essentially
stop the regulatory process from moving forward."[4
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/new_product_manufactured_doubt.050629.h=
tm>
]
=20
[To be continued.]
=20
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
=20
[1] Peter Waldman, "Common Industrial Chemicals in Tiny Doses Raise
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/chemical_raise_health_issues.wsj.050725=
.htm
>=20
Health Issue
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/chemical_raise_health_issues.wsj.050725=
.htm
> ," Wall Street Journal July 25, 2005, pg. 1.
=20
[2] David Michaels, "Doubt is Their Product
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/doubt_is_their_product.050601.htm> ,"
Scientific American Vol.
292, No. 6 (June 1, 2005), pgs. 96-101.
=20
[3] Rick Weiss, "'Data Quality' Law is Nemesis of Regulation
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/data_quality_act_is_nemesis_of_regulati=
on.2
0040816.htm> ,"
Washington Post August 26, 2004.
=20
[4] Jeff Nesmith, "New product for U.S. industry: 'manufactured
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/new_product_manufactured_doubt.050629.h=
tm>=20
doubt'
<http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/new_product_manufactured_doubt.050629.h=
tm>
," Austin (Tex.) Statesman June 26, 2005.
=20
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH NEWS
Environmental Research Foundation
P.O. Box 160
New Brunswick, N.J.  08903
Fax (732) 791-4603; E-mail: erf@rachel.org
=20
SUBSCRIPTIONS
=20
Subscriptions to Rachel's News are free. To subscribe,
send a blank E-mail to join-rachel@gselist.org.
=20
BACK ISSUES IN ENGLISH AND SPANISH
=20
All back issues are on the web at: http://www.rachel.org in
text and PDF formats.
=20
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
=20
Permission to reprint Rachel's is hereby granted to everyone,
though we ask that you not change the contents and we ask that
you provide proper attribution.
=20
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 this material is
distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior
interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes.
=20
Some of this material may be copyrighted by others. We believe
we are making "fair use" of the material under Title 17, but if
you choose to use it for your own purposes, you will need to
consider "fair use" in your own case. --Peter Montague, editor
=20
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^






------_=_NextPart_001_01C5C84A.B761314A
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html>

<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered)">
<title>Message</title>

<style>
<!--
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
p
	{margin-right:0in;
	margin-left:0in;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman";}
pre
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:10.0pt;
	font-family:"Courier New";}
span.EmailStyle19
	{font-family:Arial;
	color:navy;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>

</head>

<body bgcolor=3Dwhite lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dblue>

<div class=3DSection1>

<div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New =
Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

</div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 color=3Dnavy face=3D"Times New =
Roman"><span
style=3D'font-size:12.0pt;color:navy'>For those who like to keep up on =
the issue
of endocrine disruptors, you may be interested in subscribing to =
Rachel&#8217;s
Precaution Reporter, a new free publication. Rachel&#8217;s is very =
political,
but I think it is important to learn what people are reading &#8211; =
whether you
believe it is true or not! Rachel&#8217;s provides thought-provoking =
opinions, promotes
the precautionary approach and often focuses on endocrine disruptors =
&#8211;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Happy Reading!</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>Laurie</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 color=3Dnavy face=3DArial><span =
style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:navy'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

<div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

</div>

<div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></p>

</div>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'>To start your own free subscription to Rachel's, <br>
send a blank Email to: <a =
href=3D"mailto:join-rachel@gselist.org">join-rachel@gselist.org</a></span=
></font></p>

<pre><b><font size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;
font-weight:bold'>ANNOUNCEMENT:</span></font></b> We have just launched =
a new</pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>publication called <b><span
style=3D'font-weight:bold'>Rachel's Precaution =
Reporter</span></b>,</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>aimed at =
keeping readers informed about the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>precautionary principle as it spreads =
around</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>the world =
and across the U.S. You can find it <a =
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/rpr-html.htm" =
target=3D"_blank">here</a>.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>To start =
your own free subscription, send a </span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>blank =
E-mail to <a
href=3D"mailto:join-rpr-html@gselist.org">join-rpr-html@gselist.org</a>.<=
/span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<=
/span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<=
/span></font></pre><pre><b><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-weight:bold'>RACHEL'S ENVIRONMENT &amp; =
HEALTH NEWS #824</span></font></b></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>http://www.rachel.org</span></font></pre><pre>=
<font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>August =
18, 2005</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<=
/span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<=
/span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><b><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-weight:bold'>Part =
1:</span></font></b></pre><pre><b><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-weight:bold'>ENDING GOVERNMENT REGULATION =
BY MANUFACTURING DOUBT</span></font></b></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>By Peter =
Montague</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Thirty =
years ago, scientists began reporting birth defects and =
unusual</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>homosexual behavior in wildlife, which they =
couldn't explain. (See</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'><a
href=3D"http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=3D992" =
target=3D"_blank">Rachel's #146</a>, <a
href=3D"http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=3D870" =
target=3D"_blank">#263</a>.) By the late 1980s, Theo Colborn -- an =
expert</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>on the =
Great Lakes -- thought she saw a pattern, and she =
pulled</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>together =
a scientific meeting in July 1991 to discuss it. The =
result</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>was the =
&quot;Wingspread Statement&quot; on hormone-disrupting chemicals =
which</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>began:</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&quot;We =
are certain of the following:</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&quot;A =
large number of man-made chemicals that have been released into =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>environment, as well as a few natural ones, =
have the potential to</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>disrupt =
the endocrine [hormone] system of animals, =
including</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>humans.... Many wildlife populations are =
already affected by these</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>compounds.&quot; (<a
href=3D"http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=3D870" =
target=3D"_blank">Rachel's #263</a>)</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Five =
years later, Colborn, joined by biologist Pete Myers =
and</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>journalist Dianne Dumanoski, popularized the =
idea that industrial</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>chemicals =
at low levels can interfere with hormones in wildlife =
and</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>quite =
possibly in humans. Their book, &quot;Our Stolen Future,&quot; caused =
New</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>York =
Times science writer Gina Kolata to go ballistic. Reviewing =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>book, =
Kolata scoffed at the main hypothesis, that industrial =
chemicals</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>may be =
interfering with the hormones that control and regulate =
growth,</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>health =
and behavior in wildlife and humans, leading to increases =
in</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>birth =
defects, problems of sexual development, breast cancer, =
prostate</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>cancer, =
and even mental problems like attention deficit =
disorder,</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>reduced =
IQ, and violent behavior.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Kolata =
said &quot;the factual basis of the book's alarms... have =
been</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>refuted =
by careful studies,&quot; though she did not cite a single study =
as</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>evidence. =
To be fair, Ms. Kolata was merely reflecting the views =
of</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>the =
chemical industry on the question of hormone disruption. =
The</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>industry =
had a great deal at stake. If the theory of =
hormone</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>disruption were true, the chemical industry =
could only be viewed as a</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>major =
menace to public health and the natural =
environment.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Now, =
almost 10 years later, the debate over hormone disruption =
seems</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>to be =
over. The Wall Street Journal conceded this summer that =
low</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>levels of =
industrial chemicals are linked to rising rates of =
childhood</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>cancer =
and brain disorders, among other maladies.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Here's =
the opening paragraph of the Journal's front-page story =
July</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>25, =
2005:</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&quot;For =
years, scientists have struggled to explain rising rates of =
some</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>cancers =
and childhood brain disorders. Something about modern =
living</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>has =
driven a steady rise of certain maladies, from breast and =
prostate</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>cancer to =
autism and learning disabilities.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&quot;One =
suspect now is drawing intense scrutiny: the prevalence in =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>environment of certain industrial chemicals =
at extremely low levels. A</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>growing =
body of animal research suggests to some scientists that =
even</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>minute =
traces of some chemicals, always assumed to be =
biologically</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>insignificant, can affect such processes as =
gene activation and the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>brain =
development of newborns.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&quot;An =
especially striking finding: It appears that some substances =
may</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>have =
effects at the very lowest exposures that are absent at =
higher</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>levels.... This challenges an axiom of =
toxicology stated by the Swiss</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>chemist =
Paracelsus nearly 500 years ago: The dose makes =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>poison.&quot;[<a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/chemical_raise_health_issues.wsj=
.050725.htm"
target=3D"_blank">1</a>] [See <a
href=3D"http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=3D2261" =
target=3D"_blank">Rachel's #754</a>, <a
href=3D"http://www.rachel.org/bulletin/index.cfm?issue_ID=3D2271" =
target=3D"_blank">#755</a>.]</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>The =
Journal went on to point out that many scientists are =
now</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>convinced =
that insignificant levels of several individual =
chemicals</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>can =
combine to produce significant effects.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>The =
Journal explained: The harm from low-level exposure to a =
single</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>hormone-disrupting chemical &quot;will always =
be small,&quot; said Andreas</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Kortenkamp, who directs scientific research =
on hormone-disrupting</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>chemicals =
for the European Union (EU). But exposure to low levels =
of</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>many =
chemicals simultaneously will produce a cumulative effect on =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>human =
hormone system &quot;that is likely to be very large,&quot; =
Kortenkamp</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>told the =
Journal.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Given =
these facts, it seems safe to say that the chemical industry =
is</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>now =
widely acknowledged as a major menace to public health and =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>natural =
environment. This presents the industry with an =
uncomfortable</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>problem =
of financial liability.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Naturally, as a matter of self-preservation, =
the industry has</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>developed =
a defensive response. Of course the industry has =
been</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>studying =
these problems at least as long as Theo Colborn has =
been</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>studying =
them. Industry scientists and lawyers knew the truth =
long</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>before it =
made its way onto the front page of the Wall Street =
Journal</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>-- just =
as the tobacco industry knew the truth about tobacco at =
least</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>50 years =
before they publicly acknowledged the problem of lung =
cancer.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>The =
chemical industry response has been complex and =
exceedingly</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>clever, =
intended to make it impossible for government to =
effectively</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>regulate =
any industry. The strategy has succeeded in =
spades.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>In the =
&quot;old days&quot; -- say, around 1975 -- a chemical like DDT could =
be</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>banned =
because government scientists examined the =
scientific</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>literature, balanced &quot;the weight of the =
evidence,&quot; and concluded that</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>DDT was =
probably causing serious harm to wildlife, such as the =
bald</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>eagle, =
our national emblem.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Today it =
would be impossible to ban a chemical on such grounds =
because</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>a series =
of laws and regulations passed during the past 20 years =
have</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>changed =
the standards for scientific &quot;proof&quot; that =
government</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>regulators must =
meet.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Industry's main strategy for ending =
government regulation is the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>manufacture of uncertainty and doubt. =
&quot;If, for example, studies show</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>that a =
company is exposing its workers to dangerous levels of =
a</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>certain =
chemical, the business typically responds by hiring its =
own</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>researchers to cast doubt on the =
studies,&quot; writes David Michaels in</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Scientific American.[<a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/doubt_is_their_product.050601.ht=
m"
target=3D"_blank">2</a>]</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2 =
face=3D"Courier New"><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Increasingly, the =
U.S. regulatory system can be paralyzed by =
doubt.</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>The system assumes =
that anyone can do anything they want to do =
(so</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>long as =
it is legal), until harm can be proven. Until harm can =
be</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>proven, =
anything goes. If I move into your town and set up a =
small</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>shop and =
start belching bright blue smoke into the sky, it is up =
to</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>you to =
prove that blue smoke causes harm before anyone can question =
my</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>operation.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Once =
suspicion of harm is raised, the burden is still on =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>government and the public to prove harm. If =
one study shows that blue</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>smoke =
causes asthma in children, the government may begin to =
examine</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>all =
studies of blue smoke and eventually act on the weight of =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>evidence. =
(If government ever takes action to control blue smoke, =
we</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>blue =
smoke producers can demand our day in court, but that's a =
later</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>chapter =
in this story.)</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Given the =
way the system works, as a blue smoke producer, it pays =
me</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>to =
discredit previous blue smoke studies, to change &quot;the weight of =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>evidence.&quot; With blue smoke studies in =
doubt, regulators will be</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>paralyzed. &quot;On the one hand we have =
studies showing harm from blue</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>smoke, on =
the other hand those studies have been questioned by =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Blue =
Smoke Association. Until this scientific dispute is resolved, =
we</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>can't =
take action.&quot; This is how the regulatory system =
works.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&quot;Doubt is our =
product.&quot;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>It was =
the tobacco industry that discovered the power of doubt in =
a</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>regulatory system that can be paralyzed by =
uncertainty. In 1969, an</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>executive =
of Brown &amp; Williamson (now owned by R.J. Reynolds) =
actually</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>described =
the strategy in a memo: &quot;Doubt is our product since it =
is</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>the best =
means for competing with the 'body of fact' that exists =
in</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>the mind =
of the general public.&quot;[<a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/doubt_is_their_product.050601.ht=
m"
target=3D"_blank">2</a>]</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2 =
face=3D"Courier New"><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>It turns out that =
creating doubt is remarkably easy to do. Take =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>example =
of atrazine, the potent weed killer that has been used =
for</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>nearly 50 =
years. An estimated 80 million pounds of atrazine are =
spread</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>into the =
environment each year in the U.S. In some environments, =
it</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>persists and retains its toxicity for =
decades.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>The =
initial concern about atrazine was cancer.&nbsp; Atrazine =
clearly</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>causes =
cancer in laboratory rats. And the workers in a =
Louisiana</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2 face=3D"Courier =
New"><span style=3D'font-size:
10.0pt'>atrazine factory have unusually high rates of prostate cancer. =
But</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Syngenta =
-- the Swiss firm that makes hundreds of millions of =
dollars</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>each year =
selling atrazine in the U.S. -- has successfully cast =
doubt</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>on these facts, paralyzing regulators. =
Syngenta argues that atrazine</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>affects =
rats via biological mechanisms that do not exist in =
humans,</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>and they =
say their workers have high rates of prostate cancer =
only</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>because =
the company is extra vigilant looking for cancers among =
its</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>workers.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Meanwhile, for years evidence has been =
accumulating, showing that</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>atrazine =
scrambles the sex hormones of frogs, turning males =
into</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>hermaphrodites. A hermaphrodite has sex =
organs of both genders. To</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>prove =
otherwise, Syngenta hired a biologist named Tyrone B. Hayes, =
a</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>biology =
professor at University of California, Berkeley. But =
Professor</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Hayes's =
experiments came out wrong and showed unmistakably =
that</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>atrazine =
&quot;demasculinizes&quot; male frogs. Compared to unexposed =
frogs,</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>males =
frogs exposed to atrazine have smaller larynxes (voice =
boxes),</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>male =
hormone (testosterone) levels that are one-tenth of normal, and =
a</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>mix of =
male and female traits -- they are hermaphrodites. =
Syngenta</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>would not =
give Professor Hayes permission to publish his studies, =
so</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>he ran a =
series of his own experiments on a wider variety of =
frogs,</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>and =
published his results in prestigious journals (Nature, and =
the</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Proceedings of the National Academy of =
Sciences). &quot;We showed that</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>these animals are =
chemically castrated,&quot; Professor Hayes said. =
Four</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>other =
groups of independent researchers in three countries =
reached</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>similar =
conclusions.[<a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/data_quality_act_is_nemesis_of_r=
egulation.20040816.htm"
target=3D"_blank">3</a>]</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2 =
face=3D"Courier New"><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Syngenta solved =
this problem by creating doubt about Professor =
Hayes's</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>studies. =
They hired scientists to reproduce the studies, but =
those</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>scientists did sloppy work and were not able =
to reach the same</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>conclusions that Hayes reached. An EPA panel =
of outside experts found</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>numerous =
flaws and mistakes in the Syngenta studies. In at least =
two</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>of the =
studies, the &quot;unexposed&quot; group of frogs had actually =
been</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>exposed =
to atrazine. Not surprisingly, those studies did not find =
a</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>significant difference between the =
&quot;exposed&quot; and &quot;unexposed&quot; frogs. =
In</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>another =
of the studies, no conclusion could be reached because =
80-90%</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>of the =
frogs died, apparently as a result of inadequate care. =
As</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Professor =
Hayes summarized the situation, what Syngenta scientists =
did</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&quot;was =
produce a number of studies that were purposefully flawed =
and</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>misleading, and that changed the weight of =
the evidence.&quot;[<a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/data_quality_act_is_nemesis_of_r=
egulation.20040816.htm"
target=3D"_blank">3</a>]</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2 =
face=3D"Courier New"><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>So it is rather =
easy to cast doubt on a scientific study -- simply =
try</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>to =
reproduce the study using methods that are sloppy enough to =
assure</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>that the =
results will not be reproduced. &quot;On the one hand we have =
a</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>study =
showing harm, on the other hand some scientists have been =
unable</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>to =
reproduce these results.&quot; So regulators are =
paralyzed.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>As David =
Michaels told a Texas reporter, &quot;corporations and others =
who</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>manufacture =
dangerous products and pollutants have realized that =
by</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>adding =
manufactured uncertainty to the equation, they can =
essentially</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>stop the =
regulatory process from moving forward.&quot;[<a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/new_product_manufactured_doubt.0=
50629.htm"
target=3D"_blank">4</a>]</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2 =
face=3D"Courier New"><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2
face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>[To be =
continued.]</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>[1] Peter =
Waldman, &quot;<a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/chemical_raise_health_issues.wsj=
.050725.htm"
target=3D"_blank">Common Industrial Chemicals in Tiny Doses =
Raise</a></span></font></pre><pre><span
class=3DMsoHyperlink><u><font size=3D2 color=3Dblue face=3D"Courier =
New"><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'><a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/chemical_raise_health_issues.wsj=
.050725.htm"
target=3D"_blank">Health Issue</a></span></font></u></span>,&quot; Wall =
Street Journal July 25, 2005, pg. 1.</pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>[2] David =
Michaels, &quot;<a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/doubt_is_their_product.050601.ht=
m"
target=3D"_blank">Doubt is Their Product</a>,&quot; Scientific American =
Vol.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>292, No. =
6 (June 1, 2005), pgs. 96-101.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>[3] Rick =
Weiss, &quot;<a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/data_quality_act_is_nemesis_of_r=
egulation.20040816.htm"
target=3D"_blank">'Data Quality' Law is Nemesis of =
Regulation</a>,&quot;</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2 =
face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Washington</span></font> Post August 26, =
2004.</pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>[4] Jeff =
Nesmith, &quot;<a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/new_product_manufactured_doubt.0=
50629.htm"
target=3D"_blank">New product for U.S. industry: =
'manufactured</a></span></font></pre><pre><span
class=3DMsoHyperlink><u><font size=3D2 color=3Dblue face=3D"Courier =
New"><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'><a
href=3D"http://www.precaution.org/lib/05/new_product_manufactured_doubt.0=
50629.htm"
target=3D"_blank">doubt'</a></span></font></u></span>,&quot; Austin =
(Tex.) Statesman June 26, 2005.</pre><pre><font size=3D2 face=3D"Courier =
New"><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font size=3D2
face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<=
/span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<=
/span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>RACHEL'S =
ENVIRONMENT &amp; HEALTH NEWS</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Environmental Research =
Foundation</span></font></pre><pre><font
  size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>P.O. =
Box</span></font> 160</pre><pre><font size=3D2 face=3D"Courier =
New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>New Brunswick</span></font>, =
N.J.&nbsp; 08903</pre><pre><font size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Fax (732) 791-4603; E-mail: =
erf@rachel.org</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>SUBSCRIPTIONS</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Subscriptions to Rachel's News are free. To =
subscribe,</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>send a =
blank E-mail to <a
href=3D"mailto:join-rachel@gselist.org">join-rachel@gselist.org</a>.</spa=
n></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>BACK =
ISSUES IN ENGLISH AND SPANISH</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>All back =
issues are on the web at: http://www.rachel.org =
in</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>text and =
PDF formats.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>COPYRIGHT =
NOTICE</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Permission to reprint Rachel's is hereby =
granted to everyone,</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>though we =
ask that you not change the contents and we ask =
that</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>you =
provide proper attribution.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>In =
accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 this material =
is</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>distributed without profit to those who have =
expressed a prior</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>interest =
in receiving it for research and educational =
purposes.</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>Some of =
this material may be copyrighted by others. We =
believe</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>we are =
making &quot;fair use&quot; of the material under Title 17, but =
if</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>you =
choose to use it for your own purposes, you will need =
to</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>consider =
&quot;fair use&quot; in your own case. --Peter Montague, =
editor</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>&nbsp;</span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<=
/span></font></pre><pre><font
size=3D2 face=3D"Courier New"><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt'>^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<=
/span></font></pre>

<p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"><span =
style=3D'font-size:
12.0pt'><br>
<br>
</span></font></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>

------_=_NextPart_001_01C5C84A.B761314A--