<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:v =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w =
"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m =
"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml"><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.3059" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE>@font-face {
        font-family: Calibri;
}
@page Section1 {size: 8.5in 11.0in; margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; }
P.MsoNormal {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"
}
LI.MsoNormal {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"
}
DIV.MsoNormal {
        FONT-SIZE: 11pt; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"
}
A:link {
        COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlink {
        COLOR: blue; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
A:visited {
        COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {
        COLOR: purple; TEXT-DECORATION: underline; mso-style-priority: 99
}
SPAN.EmailStyle17 {
        COLOR: windowtext; FONT-FAMILY: "Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-style-type: personal-compose
}
.MsoChpDefault {
        mso-style-type: export-only
}
DIV.Section1 {
        page: Section1
}
</STYLE>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></HEAD>
<BODY lang=EN-US vLink=purple link=blue>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=970382115-12032007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>For some reason I don't have the rest of this
discussion. But if this point wasn't made before, it should be made.
Any one can nominate candidates for the Safe Drinking Water Act contaminant
review! As of two years ago, when I saw a presentation by someone from
this program, no nominations had been made for pharmaceuticals, and the speaker
was encouraging that people consider doing it.</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=970382115-12032007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=970382115-12032007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2>The process is described at: <A
href="http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ccl/ccl3.html#one">http://www.epa.gov/safewater/ccl/ccl3.html#one</A> .
This is what EPA says there:</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=970382115-12032007><FONT face=Arial
color=#0000ff size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left><SPAN class=970382115-12032007>
<P id=one><STRONG>Who can nominate contaminants for the CCL?</STRONG><BR>EPA is
seeking nominations from any person who is interested, including members of the
general public, stakeholders, agencies, and industry. You can nominate
chemicals, microbes, or other materials for consideration on the CCL by sending
information electronically, or in hard copy to EPA. Although it is optional, all
nominations will request you provide us with information (including your name,
title, affiliation, phone number, mailing address, and email address). As EPA
considers contaminants for the CCL, the Agency will evaluate the information for
nominated contaminants.</P>
<P><SPAN class=970382115-12032007><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>Rick
Reibstein</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=970382115-12032007><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>MA
Office of Technical Assistance for Toxics Use Reduction</FONT></SPAN></P>
<P><SPAN class=970382115-12032007><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </P><!-- #BeginLibraryItem "/library/_css_topofpage.lbi" --></SPAN></DIV><BR>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B> pharmwaste-bounces@lists.dep.state.fl.us
[mailto:pharmwaste-bounces@lists.dep.state.fl.us] <B>On Behalf Of
</B>gressitt<BR><B>Sent:</B> Saturday, March 10, 2007 10:33 AM<BR><B>To:</B>
pharmwaste@lists.dep.state.fl.us<BR><B>Subject:</B> [Pharmwaste] (no
subject)<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=Section1>
<P class=MsoNormal>RE the quote below, what is the status of this “list?” Did
Pharmaceuticals make it in if it was promulgated? <o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal>Stevan<o:p></o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></P>
<P class=MsoNormal><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: 10pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Courier New'">its
upcoming contaminant candidate list 3<BR>> > (CCL3), which the<BR>>
> agency hopes to propose this winter. Under the SDWA,<BR>> EPA<BR>>
> is required to<BR>> > develop CCLs that identify contaminants that
may<BR>> require<BR>> > future<BR>> >
regulation.</SPAN><o:p></o:p></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>