<html dir="ltr">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<style id="owaParaStyle">P {
MARGIN-BOTTOM: 0px; MARGIN-TOP: 0px
}
</style>
</head>
<body fPStyle="1" ocsi="0">
<div style="direction: ltr;font-family: Tahoma;color: #000000;font-size: 10pt;">
<div>
<p>Just under 3% of possible DEA authorized collectors have registered to do take-back. 81% of these are pharmacies, with most of the rest being hospitals or clinics. About 1% are narcotic treatment programs, distributors, and reverse distributors.
</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/687719.pdf">https://www.gao.gov/assets/690/687719.pdf</a></p>
<p>Some excerpts from this GAO report:</p>
<p> </p>
<p><em><strong>Statistic most surprising to me:</strong> </em></p>
<p>"Though we do not have information on the extent to which individuals use DEA’s prescription drug disposal bins, we were able to estimate that as of April 2017,
<font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">about half of the country’s population lived less than 5 miles away from a pharmacy or other DEA-authorized entity offering a prescription disposal bin.</font> In 21 states, at least 50 percent of the state’s population
lived within 5 miles of a prescription disposal bin. (See figure 3)."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Specifically, about <font style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00">52 percent of the population in urban areas lived less than 5 miles away from a disposal bin, compared to about 13 percent of the population in rural areas</font>. Furthermore, about 44 percent
of the population in rural areas lived even further away—more than 30 miles away from a disposal bin. "</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"As of April 2017, Connecticut, Missouri, and Maine had the lowest participation rates, with 0.11, 0.22, and 0.70 percent, respectively.19 In contrast, North Dakota had the highest participation rate, with 32.0 percent of its pharmacies and other eligible
entities registered to be authorized collectors. The state with next highest participation rate was Alaska, with 8.96 percent. In North Dakota, the state’s Board of Pharmacy provides funding for authorized collectors to purchase and maintain the disposal bins.
According to a board official, the board decided to fund these activities to increase participation rates and plans to continue its funding indefinitely using revenue generated from prescription drug licensing fees it collects."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"In addition, our analysis shows that about 82 percent of all authorized collectors were located in urban areas as of April 2017. However, when comparing the entities registered to be authorized collectors with the total number of eligible entities, we found
that a larger percentage of the eligible entities in rural areas became authorized collectors compared with those in urban areas (see table 2)."</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong><em>Reasons cited for not participating:</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em></em></strong> </p>
<p><strong>Cost:</strong> Stakeholders said that the costs associated with purchasing, installing, and managing the disposal bins is a factor that explains the relatively low rate of participation</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Uncertainty:</strong> Stakeholders also told us that uncertainty regarding how to comply with aspects of DEA’s regulations for prescription drug disposal bins affected their decisions to participate. One stakeholder added that many eligible entities
decide not to participate because uncertainties over participation requirements could result in inadvertent non-compliance with DEA’s regulations.
</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As an example of their uncertainty over some of the requirements governing the disposal bins, officials from both of the reverse distributor stakeholders we interviewed cited DEA’s non-retrievable standard for destruction of the inner liners of the bins.
DEA requires that the method of destruction be sufficient to render all controlled substances nonretrievable, meaning that the physical and chemical conditions of the controlled substances must be permanently altered and unusable in order to prevent diversion
for illicit purposes. Both reverse distributor stakeholders told us that they are uncertain about whether certain disposal methods meet this standard, and they said that the agency has not provided further guidance on how reverse distributors can meet this
requirement. DEA officials told us that the agency responds to questions about whether a specific method of destruction meets the non-retrievable standard by telling the registrant to test the remnants after destruction, to see if any components of the controlled
substance are still present. In its summary of the regulations implementing the Disposal Act, DEA stated that in order to allow for the development of various methods of destruction, the agency did not require a specific method of destruction as long as the
desired result is achieved.22 However, DEA officials stated that to their knowledge, incineration is the only method known to meet the non-retrievable standard to date, but the officials hoped other methods will be developed in the future.
</p>
<p> </p>
<p>When asked about the guidance they provide to authorized collectors of unused prescription drugs or those eligible to become authorized collectors, DEA officials told us that they post frequently-asked questions on their website, routinely answer questions
from participants and others, and give training presentations at conferences that include information on the disposal bins. In our prior work, we found problems with DEA’s communication and guidance to stakeholders. In 2015, we recommended that DEA identify
and implement cost-effective means for communicating regularly with pharmacies and other entities authorized to handle controlled substances.23 DEA agreed with the recommendation, and officials told us that, starting in August 2017, these entities can subscribe
to DEA’s website to receive notifications when it is updated with new guidance. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Stakeholders also noted that some DEA requirements related to disposal bins may conflict with other state and federal requirements governing the transportation and disposal of hazardous waste, which includes some controlled substances. For example, the two
reverse distributor stakeholders told us that some incinerator permits issued by states require that hazardous waste be examined before incineration; however, DEA requirements do not allow the contents of the liners to be examined, even at the time of incineration.
To address the incinerator permit requirements, one reverse distributor told us that they use the Environmental Protection Agency’s hazardous waste household exemption, which treats the liners as household waste and thereby allows incinerator facilities to
destroy the liners without examining the contents or violating their state permit.24 In addition, some stakeholders raised concerns that DEA’s regulations may conflict with other federal regulations. For instance, one stakeholder noted that they recently learned
that transporting the disposal bin’s inner liners could violate Department of Transportation regulations. DEA officials told us that they were aware of this, explaining that the conflict was between DEA’s requirement that controlled substances be transported
in liners and the Department of Transportation’s requirement that this type of waste be transported in sturdy containers. According to DEA officials, this conflict has been resolved by the Department of Transportation allowing reverse distributors to place
the liners inside sturdy containers kept on trucks.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Participation in or Availability of Similar Efforts: </strong>Stakeholders said that some pharmacies and other eligible entities were already participating in other, similar efforts that allow for the safe disposal of controlled substances, and therefore
they did not want to invest additional resources into participating as authorized collectors using disposal bins.
</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma">
<div style="FONT-SIZE: 13px; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma"><font size="+0"><span lang="en-US">
<div><font size="2">Ed Gottlieb<br>
Chair, Coalition for Safe Medication Disposal<br>
Board Member, New York Product Stewardship Council<br>
</font></div>
<font size="2"></font>
<div><font size="2">Industrial Pretreatment Coordinator</font></div>
<font size="2"></font>
<div><font size="2">Ithaca Area Wastewater Treatment Facility</font><br>
<font size="2">525 3</font><sup>rd</sup><font size="2"> Street</font></div>
<font size="2"></font>
<div><font size="2">Ithaca, NY 14850</font></div>
<font size="2"></font>
<div><font size="2">(607) 273-8381</font></div>
<font size="2"></font>
<div><font size="2">fax: (607) 273-8433</font></div>
</span></font></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>