[Sqg-program] F DEP SECRETARY ANNOUNCES STRENGTHENED PENALTY GUIDELINES AT KEYNOTE SPEECH TO MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL GATHERING

Perrigan, Glen Glen.Perrigan at dep.state.fl.us
Thu Jul 19 14:10:12 EDT 2007


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 18, 2007

CONTACT: Sarah Williams, Press Secretary,  (850) 245-2112 - office 

 
(850) 519-2897 - cell 

 

DEP SECRETARY ANNOUNCES STRENGTHENED PENALTY GUIDELINES AT KEYNOTE SPEECH TO
MAJOR ENVIRONMENTAL GATHERING

--Updates to guidelines will provide additional deterrent for egregious
environmental law violators-- 

 

TALLAHASSEE - During his keynote address at the Florida Chamber's 21st Annual
Environmental Permitting Summer School, before more than 800 attendees,
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) Secretary Michael W.
Sole today announced significant changes to the agency's penalty guidelines.
The new guidelines will result in stiffer penalties by taking a tougher
stance on the most serious environmental violations statewide. In 2006, DEP
enforcement cases with monetary penalties assessed numbered more than 1,300.

 

"The changes to DEP's guidelines provide a stronger deterrent for the most
egregious violations, ultimately reducing the number of significant
infractions that occur," said DEP Secretary Sole. "I want to change the idea
that 'penalties are a cost of doing business' by emphasizing the agency's
tough stance against violators."

 

DEP has maintained penalty guidelines since the mid-1980s that provide
direction to staff on how to calculate penalties for enforcement cases. In
2001, the Florida Legislature passed the Environmental Litigation Reform Act
(ELRA) to provide a clear, efficient process to address less significant
violations, which amount to approximately 90 percent of DEP's enforcement
cases annually. ELRA has been successful by decreasing the average time it
takes DEP to resolve litigation in the less significant cases - reducing the
average length of time from two years to four months - and providing a more
efficient basis for negotiating settlements in cases involving penalties of
$10,000 or less.  

 

"With this major step forward, DEP is emphasizing that compliance with
environmental regulations is, bottom line, better for business. It's not only
better for the state, but for private industry as well," said DEP Secretary
Sole.

 

The deterrent value of penalties for significant violations has not kept pace
with Florida's economy and has therefore diminished over time. Updates to the
penalty guidelines also address violations not covered under ELRA. The
stiffer penalties would apply to approximately 10 percent of enforcement
actions taken by the agency, affecting 50 to 75 percent of the total penalty
amounts assessed by DEP for major violations. DEP will take a tougher stance
by increasing penalties and providing clearer guidance on pursuing
enforcement for significant infractions that:

*	Involve hazardous waste and/or hazardous substance violations;
*	Result in economic benefit to a company or individual;
*	Are intentional and/or habitual;
*	Cause significant harm to the environment; or 
*	Continue over an extended period of time.

 

DEP's penalty guidelines are easily accessible to the public through the
internet. To view the guidelines, visit
http://www.dep.state.fl.us/legal/penalty/default.htm. To learn more about our
innovative pollution prevention programs, please see
http://www.dep.state.fl.us/waste/categories/p2/.

 

 

Additional information: Changes to the penalty guidelines

There are six major changes to the guidelines that will complement the
penalties pursued under ELRA and provide a greater deterrent for the most
significant violations:

 

1.	Hazardous waste violations

The 'penalty matrix' currently used to calculate penalties for violations of
the storage, treatment or disposal of hazardous waste range from $100 per day
(minor violations) to $25,000 per day (major violations).  The penalties for
hazardous waste violations will be significantly increased to match the
recent increases adopted by EPA, which range from $500 per day (minor
violations) to $32,500 per day (major violations). Additional instructions
will be added to the 'penalty matrix' to help identify circumstances in which
the maximum amount allowed by law, $50,000 per day per violation, should be
pursued.

 

Based on an analysis of DEP enforcement actions between 2002 and 2005,
hazardous waste violations account for approximately 18 percent of the total
enforcement actions.  The total assessed penalties during this same time
period for hazardous waste violations was $4.75 million (17 percent) of the
Department's assessed penalties. The proposed increase in the penalty matrix
is expected to result in an increase of the assessed value for significant
violations (those in which penalties exceed $10,000) by approximately 30
percent. 

 

2.	Hazardous substance violations

A 'penalty matrix' for violations involving the release of hazardous
substances (as defined in Florida law) is now part of DEP's penalty
guidelines. The matrix currently used to calculate penalties for violations
involving hazardous substances includes a maximum penalty of $10,000 per day,
which is the same amount used for violations that do not involve hazardous
substances. With these changes, DEP will pursue penalties up to a maximum of
$25,000 per day, the highest penalty allowed by law, for this type of
violation. The proposed change would result in higher penalties for
violations involving hazardous substances, consistent with the intent of
Florida law.  

 

3.	Multi-day violations

Although the current guidelines allow for assessment of the full penalty
matrix amount for each day violations occur, that option is rarely used. Most
multi-day penalties are calculated by using the penalty matrix amount for the
first day of the violation and a much smaller amount for each day the
violation continues. The change will provide guidance so that in certain
circumstances the full penalty matrix amount will be used for at least the
first 30 days the violation continues.  

 

Multi-day penalties will be pursued in all cases in which:

*         Daily economic benefit is gained;

*         Daily adverse impacts to the environment are occurring; or

*         Prompt action to stop or mitigate the violations was not taken.

 

4.	Recovery of economic benefit obtained from violations

 

Although the current guidelines allow DEP to calculate and factor in the
economic benefit for any violation, that option is rarely used. This change
will require DEP to include economic benefit in all penalty calculations when
it can be practically determined, and to establish guidance to help in that
determination. 

 

For example, if a developer conducted dredging and filling of a wetland
without a permit so that a shopping center could open sooner than it would
have had a permit been obtained, the cost savings generated by the early
opening of the shopping center would be an economic benefit to the developer.
Without factoring in the economic benefit, the penalty calculated for three
days of illegal dredging and filling might be $2,000 per day for a total of
$6,000.  If the developer saved $24,000 by opening the shopping center early
due to the dredging and filling without a permit, a penalty that factored in
the economic benefit gained by the developer would be $6,000 for three days
of illegal dredging and filling plus $24,000 for the economic benefit, for a
total of $30,000.

 

5.	Deliberate or chronic violations

The current guidelines provide a range of penalties in each matrix box. This
change will provide additional guidance on when to calculate penalties based
upon the top of the range in the matrix box (or the highest amount). Examples
include violations that are deliberate or chronic, which should result in
consistently higher penalties to deter these major infractions.

 

6.	Penalty matrices vs. ELRA penalty schedules

This change will update the penalty guidelines to provide guidance on which
penalty matrices or schedules should be used to calculate penalty amounts.
With this change, the most appropriate penalty matrix, and not the ELRA
penalty schedules, will be used for cases that involve penalties that exceed
$10,000.

 

The penalty amounts provided in the ELRA penalty schedules are typically
lower than the penalty amounts provided in DEP's penalty matrices.  This
proposed change would only affect cases in which the total calculated penalty
using the ELRA penalty schedules exceeds $10,000.  This proposed change would
result in higher penalties being pursued for many violations.

 

--30--

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.dep.state.fl.us/pipermail/sqg-program/attachments/20070719/229d9945/attachment-0001.html


More information about the Sqg-program mailing list