[Pharmwaste] Something Fishy about the Shenandoah River (Virginia)

DeBiasi,Deborah dldebiasi at deq.virginia.gov
Wed Mar 5 11:07:56 EST 2008



http://www.blueridgeoutdoors.com/content/March-2008/Something-Fishy-abou
t-the-Shenandoah-River/

Something Fishy about the Shenandoah River


March 2008, News of the Wood 
Something Fishy about the Shenandoah River

Arsenic from Poultry Farms Is One of Several Potential Causes for
Shenandoah Fish Kills

The way Richard Morris sees it, if poultry litter was bad for fish, his
farm pond would be in trouble. It's fed only by drainage off his corn
fields, which, like many Shenandoah Valley farms, he fertilizes with
litter from his poultry houses. But the pond is thriving; Morris'
grandson pulls 20-inch bass out of it as quickly as he can cast his
line.

Bass in the Shenandoah River, only about a mile west of Morris' farm,
have recently fared much more poorly, however. Fish kills have struck
both branches of the river each spring since 2004, killing an estimated
80 percent of adult smallmouth bass and a few other species. Four years
later, and despite the best efforts of an expert-laden "fish kill task
force," there are few good answers to the many whys: Why the Shenandoah?
Why now? Why just adults from a few species?

The prevalence of poultry farming in the Valley jumps out as one unique
watershed characteristic that may point to the cause. But that may be
too simple an answer for these fish kills. According to the fish kill
task force, it's likely the combined effect of several environmental
stressors: nutrification, pathogens, runoff, and numerous different
contaminants weaken and eventually kill certain fish.

That's not to say that the hundreds of thousands of tons of litter
produced each year in the Valley's roughly 900 poultry farms-most of
which is then spread as fertilizer on nearby fields-have been ruled out.
One hypothesized fish kill cause involves the introduction of arsenic
into the Shenandoah watershed through the use of poultry litter as
fertilizer. The poultry feed additive Roxarsone has attracted growing
scrutiny nationwide as an environmental health concern. Roxarsone, or
3-nitro-4-hydroxyphenylarsonic acid, has been used for decades to
control intestinal parasites and promote growth in poultry. It contains
arsenic, though bound up in a relatively harmless form. Once Roxarsone
finds its way through the bird and into the litter, however, bacteria
can quickly break it down and release inorganic arsenic, a known human
carcinogen, and an immune system suppressor in fish.

Recent testing by the Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation
(DCR) detected arsenic ranging from 0.3 parts per million to 30.3 parts
per million, probably because the six major poultry companies operating
locally don't all use Roxarsone the same way, if at all. Tyson, for
example, discontinued Roxarsone use in 2004 in response to growing
national concern over potential human health impacts. Cargill-the
company for whom Morris raises turkeys-hasn't used Roxarsone locally for
a number of years.

Nevertheless, the DCR testing found an average arsenic concentration of
11.7 parts per million, noticeably higher than horse, beef, and dairy
cattle manure samples also tested. Because inorganic arsenic is water
soluble, arsenic in poultry litter spread on fields can eventually be
washed into the river and contribute to the fish kills.

Arsenic in excess of the Department of Environmental Quality's screening
value showed up in 19 percent of Shenandoah River fish tissue samples
tested in 2005. The finding doesn't necessarily mean arsenic caused the
fish kills; 2005 tissue samples from the nearby York and Holston
watersheds, neither of which have experienced Shenandoah-like kills,
exceeded the arsenic screening value by 56 percent and 36 percent,
respectively.

The poultry industry has reacted with skepticism to the idea that
poultry litter or Roxarsone specifically has anything to do with the
fish kills. Hobey Bauhan, president of the Virginia Poultry Federation,
an industry advocacy group, acknowledges the DCR testing showing
elevated arsenic levels in litter. But, he points out, the average
concentration of 11.7 parts per million falls well short of the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency's arsenic standard for land-applied
biosolids from sewage treatment plants, set at 75 parts per million.

For that matter, arsenic also shows up in various forms in pesticides
historically used in the area, and it also occurs naturally in the soil
(locally, only in small amounts, thanks to underlying geology). Even if
some level of fish kill blame eventually falls on arsenic, poultry
litter couldn't be the lone culprit, says Bauhan, whose organization has
donated $20,000 to fund fish kill investigations.

"If someone proves it's poultry litter, which I doubt will happen, then
[poultry] growers and [companies] will do everything they can to stop
it," says Morris.

Nevertheless, testing by state regulatory agencies-and the majority of
scientific literature on the subject-strongly suggest that Roxarsone use
in the Valley means more inorganic arsenic at large in the Valley. For
Jeff Kelble, Shenandoah Riverkeeper for the environmental advocacy group
Potomac Riverkeeper, that's reason enough for action.

"There's a business that's electing to continue introducing a known
carcinogen and toxic substance onto the land, and then into the water,"
he says. "That's a problem."

If anything, Kelble says, the topic deserves further study, and the
poultry industry should abandon Roxarsone altogether. DEQ is trying to
find a middle ground.

"I don't see [arsenic] as our sole focus," says Don Kain, water
compliance manager for the DEQ and a co-chair of the fish kill task
force. Dr. Vicki Blazer, a U.S. Geological Survey fish pathologist, and
Dr. Greg Garman, a Virginia Commonwealth University biology professor,
echo Kain's comments, emphasizing that arsenic remains just one of
several potential causes, which include pesticides, herbicides,
endocrine-disrupting hormones, pH swings, and unknown pathogens.

Roxarsone-derived arsenic raises numerous yet-unanswered questions,
among the biggest: Why doesn't it also affect streams on the Delmarva
Peninsula, or in Georgia, or Arkansas, or the other bright centers of
the poultry universe?

In the meantime, bloated fish continue to float along the Shenandoah.
The river is suffering from a thousand vague cuts, and there are good
reasons against bandaging any single one. But doing nothing won't stop
the bleeding.



Deborah L. DeBiasi
Email:   dldebiasi at deq.virginia.gov
WEB site address:  www.deq.virginia.gov
Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
Office of Water Permit Programs
Industrial Pretreatment/Toxics Management Program
PPCPs, EDCs, and Microconstituents
Mail:          P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, VA  23218 (NEW!)
Location:  629 E. Main Street, Richmond, VA  23219
PH:         804-698-4028
FAX:      804-698-4032



More information about the Pharmwaste mailing list