[Pharmwaste] Study Finds Pharmaceuticals, Other Micropollutants In Hudson Estuary

Tue Jul 19 09:27:01 EDT 2016

Thanks for the rant, Volkman! I'm right with ya! Endocrine disruption needs more attention. For that matter, do you know who has taken the place of Dr. Theo Colburn? Who is leading the science now after she passed in 2014?

Be well and be safe!

Dan

Dan N. King
Environmental Health Specialist II
Coordinator, Toxics-Reduction Program
Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department
3140 N Street
Lincoln, NE 68510

(402) 441.8084 Desk
(402) 430.4897 Cell
dnking at lincoln.ne.gov<mailto:dnking at lincoln.ne.gov>

[cid:image003.jpg at 01D09ED7.3EA2AC70]

From: Pharmwaste [mailto:pharmwaste-bounces at lists.dep.state.fl.us] On Behalf Of Volkman, Jennifer (MPCA)
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 4:14 PM
To: 'pharmwaste at lists.dep.state.fl.us' <pharmwaste at lists.dep.state.fl.us>; Ferrey, Mark (MPCA) <mark.ferrey at state.mn.us>
Subject: Re: [Pharmwaste] Study Finds Pharmaceuticals, Other Micropollutants In Hudson Estuary

Monday's rant to the choir:
Is anyone else frustrated that the "scientists" haven't heard of endocrine disruption? This is narrative from the 90's or 00's. I think the attached chart helps if people can understand that if a fish or frog or other aquatic species are surrounded by, absorbing and drinking in pollutants at the ppm or ppt level, they may be impacted, possibly severly. There may be accumulation by older predators that we might want to eat, as with mercury. Oh well, just keep swimming, just keep swimming! Plus if you deep fry the frog legs, that must destroy those ol' micropollutants! Keep the focus on caffeine, the majority want more of that.
Maybe I've had too much myself :)
Jennifer

From: Pharmwaste [mailto:pharmwaste-bounces at lists.dep.state.fl.us] On Behalf Of Tenace, Laurie
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 7:00 AM
To: 'pharmwaste at lists.dep.state.fl.us'
Subject: [Pharmwaste] Study Finds Pharmaceuticals, Other Micropollutants In Hudson Estuary

http://wamc.org/post/study-finds-pharmaceuticals-other-micropollutants-hudson-estuary#stream/0

A first-of-its-kind study released Friday points to a long and varied list of micropollutants in the Hudson River estuary. Dozens of products were detected, from pesticides to pharmaceuticals.

Two scientists from the Cornell University School of Civil and Environmental Engineering conducted the study<http://www.riverkeeper.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Appendix-A-2015-progress-report.pdf> in partnership with Riverkeeper, analyzing 24 water samples drawn from eight locations between the Mohawk River's confluence with the Hudson and the Tappan Zee Bridge. The samples were collected in June, July, September and October of 2015. Dr. Damian Helbling is assistant professor at Cornell University's School of Civil and Environmental Engineering.

"What we found among these 24 samples was that 83 of these 117 compounds that we suspected might be in there were actually in at least one of those samples," Helbling says. "I believe there was eight compounds of those 83 that were present in all 24 samples. So these can be considered to be extremely ubiquitous or extremely persistent types of chemicals."

One substance that showed up in all the samples was caffeine.

"I would probably have to drink the volume of the Hudson River in order to get the amount of caffeine that's just in one cup of coffee," says Helbling. "So there are very, very, very, very trace concentrations of caffeine."

He says that while this may not have an ecological effect, it could indicate human impact on water, or wastewater impact. Helbling says it comes down to parts per trillion, akin to dropping an aspirin into an Olympic-size swimming pool. Helbling says all 24 samples turned up measurable concentrations of the insect repellent DEET.

"Again, parts per trillion, so incredibly minute amount of DEET, but DEET nevertheless," Helbling says.

He says samples at three wastewater treatment plant outfalls -  Kingston, Orangetown and West Point - yielded pharmaceutical residues.

"So we found, I would say, tens, in some cases, dozens of pharmaceutical residues coming out of wastewater treatment plants along the Hudson River estuary. That's maybe the slightly unsettling news," says Helbling. "The good news is that we don't find those same compounds just downstream from the wastewater treatment plants. So the volume of water that is in the Hudson does an adequate job at diluting. So that's a great feature of the Hudson is that there's so much darn water."

Dan Shapley is Riverkeeper water quality program manager.

"This is the first study of its kind in the Hudson so we didn't know anything really before. Now we have a sense of what is out there," Shapley says. "And we know you can more pharmaceuticals at outfalls than other places."

He says the study outcome delivers a baseline of information.

"Our concern is always the health of the water and, of course, our uses of it. But we want the life in the river to be healthy and thrive," Shapley says. "And if fish and frogs and everything else is getting dosed with our pharmaceuticals, what does that mean for them. And this gives us baseline information to understand where we can go next to understand the impacts."

Helbling says where to go next is widening the breadth of the study. In fact, Helbling stepped aboard the Riverkeeper patrol boat in the Rondout in Kingston, watching samples being taken for the continuation of the micropollutant study.

"So now as they cruise from the Tappan Zee Bridge north to the Mohawk River, they're collecting samples for us for micropollutant analysis at all of the sewage treatment plant outfalls and all of the tributaries that they go into," says Helbling.

James Tierney says wastewater treatment plants are a source of micropollutants. Tierney is deputy commissioner for water resources with the state Department of Environmental Conservation. He says the state invested $20,000 into the Cornell study and will fund another $30,000 next year to broaden the study on micropollutants.

"These compounds at the level identified by the professor in this study don't violate state water quality standards developed under state law or the Clean Water Act. They don't violate drinking water maximum contaminant levels under the Safe Drinking Water Act or state programs," Tierney says. "But what they do is they provide evidence of impacts and they allow us, over time, to understand whether or not this is impact to people, impact to fish, impact to other aquatic species."

Laurie Tenace
Environmental Specialist
Waste Reduction Section
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
2600 Blair Stone Road, MS4555
Tallahassee, FL  32399
Laurie.Tenace at dep.state.fl.us<mailto:Laurie.Tenace at dep.state.fl.us>
850.245.8759

________________________________

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.dep.state.fl.us/pipermail/pharmwaste/attachments/20160719/3cb5597e/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 6480 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <http://lists.dep.state.fl.us/pipermail/pharmwaste/attachments/20160719/3cb5597e/attachment.jpg>