shrug-l: Image Server 9.3 performance reviews?

[Tripp Corbin]

Jay,

We have not played with Image server but we have messed around with
ArcGIS server. They have tweaked it a little so it will perform better
than 9.2 especially over time as more folks hit it and it builds more
cached areas. I hear 9.4 though is going to have the biggest
improvements. 

 

Tripp Corbin, MCP, CFM, GISP
Vice President, GIS/IT
ESRI Authorized Instructor
Keck & Wood, Inc. <http://www.keckwood.com/> 
(678) 417-4013
(678) 417-8785 fax



 

From: shrug-l-bounces at lists.dep.state.fl.us
[mailto:shrug-l-bounces at lists.dep.state.fl.us] On Behalf Of Jay Johnson
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 4:18 PM
To: SHRUG LIST
Subject: shrug-l: Image Server 9.3 performance reviews?

 

Has anyone had a chance to look at ESRI's latest release of Image
Server?  We have NAIP imagery for a two state area we'd like to load.
In the past the general in-house opinion has been that Image Server was
a dog, but initial buzz about 9.3 seems better.  If anyone has had a
chance to test out 9.3 I'd love to hear your comments...
Jay Johnson, GISP
Somewhere in NV...

________________________________

Need to know now? Get instant answers with Windows Live Messenger. IM on
your terms.
<http://www.windowslive.com/messenger/connect_your_way.html?ocid=TXT_TAG
LM_WL_messenger_072008> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.dep.state.fl.us/pipermail/shrug-l/attachments/20080711/91bee42c/attachment.html