shrug-l: TeleAtlas Data
Jim Robeson
jim at gpserv.com
Thu Mar 19 20:16:49 EDT 2009
Navteq data is generally better data.
JR
James M. Robeson
Mapping/GIS Sales, Trimble Certified Trainer
<mailto:Jim at gpserv.com> mailto:Jim at gpserv.com
<http://www.gpserv.com/> GPServ.com
GPServ, Inc.
Tallahassee Office
Phone (850) 656-6075
Cell (850) 212-0030
FAX (850) 656-1350
Corporate Office Address:
Phone (888) 782-1997 4380 St. Johns Parkway
Phone (407) 330-7442 Suite 100
FAX (407) 330-7443 Sanford, FL 32771
From: shrug-l-bounces at lists.dep.state.fl.us
[mailto:shrug-l-bounces at lists.dep.state.fl.us] On Behalf Of Yasar Korkmaz
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 7:02 PM
To: shrug-l at lists.dep.state.fl.us
Subject: shrug-l: TeleAtlas Data
I was wondering if anybody was using TeleAtlas streets data for geocoding? I
would be interested in hearing their reasons for their preference of
TeleAtlas over Navteq. More specifically I am trying to get an idea about
how they align with the Census TIGER roads and other base layers such as
counties, city boundaries, shorelines, water bodies etc. shapefiles? I have
Navteq data and I can see what kind of misalignment issues could there be.
Would the TeleAtlas data be almost identical to Navteq?
Thanks,
Yasar Korkmaz
GIS Manager
<http://www.citizensfla.com/> Citizens Property Insurance Corporation
<http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=2101+Maryland+Circle+Talla
hassee+FL+32303&sll=30.476473,-84.352748&sspn=0.014369,0.02738&ie=UTF8&ll=30
.471017,-84.341698&spn=0.114959,0.21904&t=h&z=13&iwloc=addr> 2101 Maryland
Circle Tallahassee, FL 32303
Tel: (850) 521-8315 | Cell (850) 519-6800
<mailto:Yasar.Korkmaz at Citizensfla.com> Yasar.Korkmaz at Citizensfla.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.dep.state.fl.us/pipermail/shrug-l/attachments/20090319/c7ae4655/attachment.html
More information about the SHRUG-L
mailing list